Effects of buying houses in different price ranges

In my last post I talked about learning to set a fair rent value for a property. Both Biff's research and the bankrate.com article indicated that the lower the price of the home, the better the return you get on it.

Therefore it seems like a no-brainer to buy cheap homes and rent them out right? Well... maybe. Biff asked me to do a quick rent comparison for investing $400,000 in various house combinations to compare what sort of rental conditions we're looking at. Here's what I sent back to him:

Monthly rent income on a combination of houses with a combined total worth of 400K (approximate).
$2,250 = 1 400k
$2,450 = 1 300k, 1 100k

$2,500 = 2 200k

$2,505 = 3 133k

$2,550 = 1 200k, 2 100k

$2,600 = 4 100k

$2,500 = 4 75k, 1 100k


As it turns out, buying lots of smaller houses does seem to offer you more in the way of rental income. However, there are more factors to consider than just rental yields. In the same e-mail to him I looked at a few other factors, some of which argued against the more/cheaper homes model:

  • Cheaper houses, and thus cheaper rent, can lead to less desirable tenants. In other words, the more expensive the rent, the more likely that the person who can afford it is somewhat responsible.
  • More houses takes more time, from both a landlording point of view and an accounting point of view.
  • Each house will incur closing costs. On the above model it'd take the best 2 house model almost 2 years to turn a great profit than the 1 house model, assuming a $5,000 closing cost per house.
And some which supported buying multiple cheaper homes:
  • More houses increases your chances of vacancy, but lowers the cost of it. If you own one $400,000 house and can't find a tenant, that's one hell of a mortgage you'll have to cover.
  • You can buy as you go. You might not have enough to buy that $500,000 apartment building yet, but instead of plopping that money into savings it might be better to start investing with something smaller.

So which is best? It depends on your business model. Biff and I decided that our goal was to cater to young military families. So we're looking for townhomes with plenty of space in the $200,000 range. Upscale and expensive that we don't get much attention from young bachelor that might treat our property with less care.


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Looks nice! Awesome content. Good job guys.
»

Test Article said...

It depends on the location actually. The price range depends on the location of the house that you want to buy. When it comes to commercial real estate Dallas, there are properties that are a bit expensive, and there are some that are not.

梁爵 said...

2020.05.03酒店工作因武漢肺炎(COVID-19、新冠肺炎)新冠肺炎連續6天零確診,讓停業快3周的酒店舞廳業者見到曙光,期盼政府讓他們重新開門做生意。業者估計,全台至少20萬人靠八大行業酒店S維持生計,其中有數萬人是依賴店家的清潔阿姨、賣口香糖、香腸這種「艱苦人」,呼籲政府慎重考慮,在防疫得當的情況下,盡快讓八大行業酒店上班復業,給他們一條生路。台北市八大行業張姓酒店業者表示,酒店歇業,酒店PT小姐雖還能兼差傳播飯局妹,但酒店打工毫無保障,私接案子還被搶、乾洗白嫖的慘狀;另泊車少爺、幹部、經紀,這些人也都各有出路,但總不如原來穩定,至於原本薪水就不高、替代性更高的清潔阿姨,更是頓時少了一份穩定薪水;還有收保特瓶、紙箱的回收阿伯,也大受影響。張姓業者說,這些依附酒店養家餬口的艱苦人,全台少說至少20萬人,如今因政府防疫停業標準不一,酒店、舞廳歇業,他們連兼差機會都沒,只能在家喝西北風「防疫」。他自嘲,「政府的作為,是寧讓人民餓死,也不能得肺炎死。」業者有苦難言。另一劉姓舞廳業者說,會配合停業的店家,都是繳稅合法業者,八大行業若轉地下化,等同「保障非法,取締合法」,政府應讓合法業者在確保防疫規範前提下復業,反而能有效控管,若都轉入地下化,風險更大。造成全台酒店舞廳停業的北市高檔酒店女公關,疫情指揮中心日前已宣布,她的感染源不明,且沒傳染給任何人。不少業者看到這消息都納悶,「小姐結案了,我們為何歇業?何時能重開?」這是攸關20多萬八大行業從業人員共同疑惑,政府應盡速給個答案。